Summary
Apple rejected the app because store metadata, screenshots, privacy claims, or listed features do not match the actual app experience.
App Store App Review issue
Apple rejected the app because store metadata, screenshots, privacy claims, or listed features do not match the actual app experience.
Use LogicSpring to run a free precheck, regenerate the right policy or disclosure pack, and shorten the loop from rejection notice to resubmission.
Apple rejected the app because store metadata, screenshots, privacy claims, or listed features do not match the actual app experience.
Reviewers see a mismatch between what the listing or review notes promise and what the app actually does.
This often overlaps with privacy claims, permission explanations, AI feature descriptions, or subscription flows.
It can be fixed quickly if you treat it as a consistency problem across every submission surface.
Review screenshots, subtitle, description, review notes, and policy links against the exact release build.
Remove outdated claims and narrow the listing to what Apple can verify in review.
Resubmit with cleaner reviewer notes that explain what is included now versus later roadmap work.
Only if the issue is purely metadata or disclosure copy. If the current build behavior still conflicts with the policy, permissions, or SDK inventory, you usually need a new build.
Prepare the updated public policy URL, the exact store fields you changed, screenshots for permission or disclosure flows where relevant, and a short reviewer note explaining what changed and why it now matches the app.
Yes. Review teams compare these surfaces together. If one says you collect or disclose something and another says you do not, the mismatch itself often becomes the next rejection.