Summary
Guideline 5.1.2 commonly points to how the app uses collected data, shares it, or gives users control after collection.
App Store App Review issue
Guideline 5.1.2 commonly points to how the app uses collected data, shares it, or gives users control after collection.
Use LogicSpring to run a free precheck, regenerate the right policy or disclosure pack, and shorten the loop from rejection notice to resubmission.
Guideline 5.1.2 commonly points to how the app uses collected data, shares it, or gives users control after collection.
Apple sees a problem in how your app uses data after it is collected, including sharing, retention, or secondary use.
This may overlap with account deletion, data access, data export, or third-party sharing explanations.
The rejection usually means reviewers do not believe the app gives users enough transparency or control.
Rewrite the policy sections covering sharing, retention, deletion, and user rights in concrete language.
Add or clarify in-app controls for account deletion or privacy choices where required.
Document in review notes where Apple can test these controls and how the updated policy maps to them.
Only if the issue is purely metadata or disclosure copy. If the current build behavior still conflicts with the policy, permissions, or SDK inventory, you usually need a new build.
Prepare the updated public policy URL, the exact store fields you changed, screenshots for permission or disclosure flows where relevant, and a short reviewer note explaining what changed and why it now matches the app.
Yes. Review teams compare these surfaces together. If one says you collect or disclose something and another says you do not, the mismatch itself often becomes the next rejection.